A chapter from my book The Swedish Story (2013)
”Sweden received many immigrants after 1945 that wanted to leave their war torn countries and were in demand from booming manufacturing industries.
They became a part of working life and Swedish society. With no racial streaks from bounds to former colonies or imported slaves, Sweden seemed like a hospitable country with a homogenous but quite bland population. Boredom, cold winters and small language were manageable obstacles.
Since the mid 1970s when borders were closed for migrant workers, Sweden has received mainly refugees from countries in internal conflicts, dictatorships or victims of catastrophes. Some refugees were more motivated by social and economic reasons to enter Sweden, than political, but questions were few, especially during the Balkan crisis 1992-1995, Somalia 1991- , Iraq and Afghanistan wars 2003 and many other regions in disorder or chaos (Middle East, north and central Africa and Latin America).
Lack of strict regulations from government and social authorities to push immigrants to provide for their own livelihood has led to harsh living conditions in certain suburbs around the major cities, lower employment rates, parallel cultures to the Swedish and a division in society between the native Swedes and the newly arrived. With seven years on average for a male immigrant to provide for his or her own living, restlessness stir from both immigrants not feeling accepted and Swedes paying for their livelihood.
Outspoken racism is rare but exists in small white supremacist groups, usually disgruntled young males in rural areas. The Sweden democrats party are often portrayed as racist but are more of a traditionally nationalist nostalgic party similar to True Finns with 20 % in Finland, Fremskrittspartiet with 23 % in Norway and Dansk Folkeparti 12 % in Denmark.
In the 2010 election, the Sweden democrats entered parliament for the first time as the 6th largest party (of 8) with 5.7 %. in 2014 the party got almost 13 %. The lack of a representation of nationalist parties before 2010 is due to the well organised socialist working class structures absorbing all opposition. The anxiety of media and establishment to acknowledge any problems with immigration backfired in 2010, when the Sweden democrats could portray themselves as martyrs of Swedish political correctness and gain votes, especially from traditional workers living in areas with many immigrants, where few journalists would enter voluntarily, not to speak of living there.
Liberal party Folkpartiet gained many votes in 2002 by arguing that a language test should be a requirement for citizenship. Sweden is unique (along with a few Western nations) in having no demands at all, besides living for four years and being reasonably non-criminal. But ruling Folkpartiet ministers have not dared to bring its own 2002 idea to parliament due to its unpopularity in the left leaning media and self-proclaimed anti-racist leagues.
The party gave anti-Islamist Somali-Dutch activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali its Demokratipris in 2005, but has since turned away from any views that could endanger the anxious party priggish stand on immigration. Islamophobia is the word used when racism is not applicable to any proposal that can be interpreted as sign of racism.
A view of native Swedes as intrinsically racist has become an accepted point of view, when two other disrespectful racist views are probably more prevalent. Primary view, one ethnic immigrant group negative to another immigrant group and second, immigrants turning negative towards Swedes (as the gang rapists did and their backers). Few Swedes dare to speak openly outside small groups they trust about this, but some books exist outside mainstream media.
Immigrants are often more outspoken, also about their fellow faulty countrymen and can discuss what goes on around them without fearing harassment, censorship or censoring themselves. Swedes are starting to understand what a laughing stock they have become among immigrants but usually keep quiet.
Journalists who have a job to write about these kinds of events and issues, such as illegal immigration, welfare frauds, plans for terrorism or criminal immigrants, do not do their work well. Stories and actual documents from illegal or dubious immigration cases at the Migration Board are available in print on the 466 pages collected by writer and migration activist Merit Wager and online everywhere except in print, television or radio. Each story would be possible to cover respectfully with regard to ethical guidelines by Union of Swedish Journalists.
Readers would get useful information, politicians would discuss policies and an open debate would follow. Or a media hunt. Journalist Jan Guillou tried already in 1980s to present Romani gypsies living in Sweden as true as he could do, which is quite well since he disclosed the Swedish intelligence service IB in 1973 and served one year in prison for doing it. Even his sober presentation was interpreted as implicitly racist.
Given the Swedish tradition of being silent, doing what is right and being kind and nice to people in dire circumstances, it is no hard guess that many Swedish authorities were and still are taken for a ride by clever immigrants of all kinds. Or not so clever as the Chilean travel agency in Valpariso which sold the same four stories named A or B or C or D along with a single ticket to Stockholm in the 1980s. The so called political refugees from the Chilean dictatorship were regular criminals, acquitted from prisons by general Pinochet just like President Fidel Castro had done with the reality behind the film character Tony Montana of Scarface and his compañeros about the same time.
Same shady mechanisms would work in transition to Sweden involving fake passports and ages, smugglers, making up stories and identities along the way. Many refugees that has come the last 30 years are hard-working and honest people who had to leave their countries with more or less decent reasons according to international conventions in Geneva or to amendments due to humanitarian, subsidiary protection or otherwise in need of protection. But migration policies are not an exact science. Norway and Finland who have signed exactly the same conventions and protocols allow much less immigrants into their countries.
Contrary to official statistics, a fourth of accepted refugees have by UN, EU or domestic legal agreements right to stay, the rest do not. 96 % of all asylum seekers do not carry passports so the frustration of civil servants at the Migration Board and among police officers is boiling. Receiving 100 000 people a year in a country of 9 million, Sweden is given high ratings and praise from UNHCR and EU. 20 % of residents in Sweden have now foreign background.
The costs of immigration are around $7- 14 billion due to higher unemployment, retraining many without education and higher expenses. The argument that sparsely populated and aging Sweden needs more people does not hold as the immigrants get old too and work less than as much as the Swedes do. Only a huge rise (15 %) of more employed immigrants would make Sweden break even in costs and benefits, which is less likely to happen and though utopian official policy, seldom discussed sensibly even by economists.
Why Sweden must receive twice as many immigrants than Norway and Denmark is usually answered that Sweden has to be more open. But if the majority of the refugees do not have legal right to stay or a workplace waiting, why must Sweden accept them? With a view of Sweden as an exceptionally decent country, a world champion in morals, it follows logically from the preceding chapters that Sweden must do what no one else does because it is the best alternative.
Calculations of resources spent on housing, livelihood, education, administration and security in receiving immigrants give that resources spent in neighboring countries (Kenya, Pakistan, Turkey etc.) are many more times effective. But even these conclusions are brushed away as implicit racism as much else. With few frank and open discussions, strange discussions start online and racism grows.
Real racism, not the kind directed to minister of culture Lena Adelsohn-Liljeroth, who accidentally cut a cake consisting of a black naked woman with the black artist Makode Linde laying under the serving table screaming in spring 2012, causing world attention and critique. The Museum of Modern Art in Stockholm had invited her and led her to the table with no intention to make an implicitly racist scene nor did she know what was happening when someone gave her a cake knife. Yet the Afro- Swedish Association blamed her as racist since she was cutting up a black woman and between the legs.
The issue blew all over the world and the mad connection of the cake with female genital mutilation was forgotten. Artist Makode Linde was not forgotten and his sensation gave a boost to his art sales. Minister Adelsohn- Liljeroth apologized. If this welfare art trick is racist, there are no words left for the real thing.
The tradition of exceptional Swedish openness in spite of even Swedish evidence to the contrary has a recent history. During the Balkan crisis summer of 1992, more than 30 000 people entered from Kosovo, the Albanian part of the failing Yugoslavian state. A few percent of them had legal status but the majority was out of work due to conflicts in other parts of Yugoslavia and in Switzerland.
The minister in charge, liberal Birgit Friggebo, did not act but told the Migration Board, who were putting up tents when renting expensive hotels was not enough, to do the necessary. Diplomatic and UNHCR reports confirmed that the leaving Kosovo Albanians were better cared for where they were and faced unemployment rather than political repression, but to no avail. The socialists who had closed borders to some extent while in charge in 1989 brought integration minister Friggebo, prime minister Carl Bildt and head Christina Rogestam of Migration Board to the Constitutional Court at Swedish parliament. Bildt was ruled as “not able to fail critique”.
This was the last time the socialists criticized their center-right opponents for being too open with immigration policies. Following decades, socialists would compete with left wing party, green party and liberals in being most open to immigration. The minority cabinet of Fredrik Reinfeldt does not have majority in parliament after the 2010 election and has been forced to seek support from the green environmentalist party. In exchange for support, the Greens have gained acceptance for receiving around 15 000 Somalis without legal documents, no restrictions of proofs of identity and support for free hospital treatment to immigrants residing in Sweden illegally, that is people residing there after their cases have been rejected in asylum or other courts and with a verdict to leave the country immediately.
Further, fears of terrorist attacks have grown since Sweden became a target for Islamist terror. It was not always so. Osama Bin Ladin actually mentioned Sweden in November 2004 around the George W. Bush re-election campaign. Bin Ladin explained in a grainy video why Al-Qaeda “attacks USA and not Sweden for example”.
Another leading Al-Qaeda ideologue, Al- Abu Mus’ab al-Suri, supported also the Scandinavian countries due to their lax security and generous welfare systems. Since then much has happened which has lead Al-Qaeda to put Sweden as No. 1 enemy in their glossy terror magazine Inspire, summer issue 2010. The enemy Sweden sent forces to Afghanistan under NATO and UN supervision and the artist Lars Wilks had portrayed the prophet Muhammed as a dog. These actions resulted in two aborted terror attacks, one in Sweden and one in Denmark but done by Swedes or residents of North African and Middle Eastern origins.
On the 10th December 2010, Taimour Abdulwahab al-Abdaly accidentally blew himself up instead of his target, Christmas shoppers by a pedestrian street in central Stockholm. He sent messages to media and police before the fatal incident, mentioning Swedish troops in Afghanistan and the artist Wilks and called “all Mujahedin in Europe and Sweden” to follow his fight.
19 days later on December 29, 2010, five men of Middle Eastern and North African origins were caught in Copenhagen by Danish and Swedish secret police before they could execute their plan. They had prepared to kill journalists and others at the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten that five years before had published cartoons of the prophet Muhammed, which had ignited more than 100 deaths and violent stormings of Danish embassies in Muslim countries.
Four of the terrorists reside in Sweden and three are Swedish citizens. An attack was also aborted in Bosnia in 2005 where Misrad Bektasevic, a jihadist Swede of Balkan descent, almost succeeded to blow up a bomb in central Sarajevo in collaboration with the real Al-Qaeda network. Artist Lars Wilks has had several attempts on his life, been attacked twice at universities (Karlstad, Uppsala) and at his residence including arson. Then in July 2011, white supremacist counter-jihadist Anders Behring Breivik killed 8 government employees in central Oslo, Norway and 69 youngsters at Utøya Island from the socialist Workers’ Youth League. The three aborted jihadist attacks would not even combined have ended in so many casualties.
Keeping these attacks in mind and many other incidents where immigrants were victims or perpetrators, falsely using Swedish welfare and fooling migration authorities but also being under attacks from Sweden democrats, has led to no possibility of a normal debate about immigration in Swedish parliament, municipal councils and certainly not in the press. There have been small streaks of racism before World War II, but since 1945 Sweden has made many efforts to keep all such concepts out of discussion about foreigners.
The opposite view that Swedish racism has been severely overestimated is rather true. Tendencies in mainstream media and policy discussions accuse normal native Swedes of racism and find racist structures in government, labour market, culture, health and schools. Insisting on respect for cultural traditions from other mostly Muslim countries, such as separate times for men and women at public baths, divided classrooms according to gender or carrying of female dresses of niquab and burqua while in school or work, divide Swedes and immigrants into unfortunate groups blaming each other for racism in a cacophony seldom heard in public debate before.
The very idea of being Swedish versus of immigrant origins, has turned many discussions sour, as some vocal defenders of multiculturalism want to have it both ways – respect for identity of people born abroad or with foreign parents and respect for their Swedishness. Even the word immigrant is not used much as it may exclude or harass people who have been born in Sweden but look foreign.
There are fuzzy lines if one goes beyond the mere fact of Swedish citizenship as what counts as Swedish, but people calling themselves Swedish and some others immigrants are not inherently racist. Reference to Swedish culture, Sweden as nation and Swedes are ridiculed, mostly by priggish Swedish journalists and grounds for victimization, hurt feelings and claims of rewards. A state television reporter was surprised in 2009 when musicians played the national anthem and asked whether the song might not be viewed politically right- wing and nationalist.
The Swedish flag has been center of similar bans as schools have asked pupils not to wear t-shirts or wave the yellow and blue flag as it could be interpreted as racist. The only ones who wave the flag and celebrate the national holiday with pride are immigrants who are happy to be in a free and decent country.
Unlike in 1930s when nationalism went right in Europe under Mussolini and Hitler, but left in Sweden, the socialists have abandoned any affirmation of nationalism as at worst racist, or at best parochial. Per Albin Hansson was able to transform feelings of patriotism using the neologism folkhemmet cleverly and turning Swedish social democracy into an exception. Contemporary left leaning leader shun all such references in favour of EU and globalism, thus losing all patriotism to the nationalist party Sweden democrats.
The situation of identifying criminal immigrants can be labeled racist. Lund University had problems of theft in 2010 and a security officer sent out a mail to staff at computer labs to look out for people with Indian or Asian features. Soon the mail was reported to the university bureau of discrimination and media and had to be rephrased so no one could identify any thieves.
Stockholm police office published a report on heroin peddling and found out that many Gambians were involved. Whether this was true or not was not analyzed, but the mentioning of this particular immigrant group was and the report was labeled racist. The last extreme story comes from the commercial television network TV3. In their talk show on wanted criminals, a clip from a surveillance camera was shown of man with non- Swedish features robbing a store, but with his face mostly blurred with a white square. A police asked viewers if they could identify this man and the studio host repeated the message, “If you recognize this man, please call this number”.
Faces of Swedish criminals are shown though. Stories like these make people frustrated and distrustful of media and establishment. Doctors protest against proposals from Migration Board on medical examinations of young people who claim to be minors under 18 years and entering easily. The doctors believe such measurements of skeleton and teeth examination are racist. Et ad infinitum.
Most immigrants find these discussions futile while some other vocal immigrants (Group D below) defend normal and universal values among Swedes and other civilizations. They defend Swedes against attacks from other immigrants (Group C below) with their agenda of multiculturalism, often aligned with radical leftism and feminism.
Intersectionality is the latest PoMo/PC buzzword but may have gone stale already. These self-proclaimed anti-racist attackers who are researchers, activists and media people are mostly funded by the Swedish government and act as spokespeople for all immigrants, telling them that Swedes do not like them, want them to leave and keep all jobs to native Swedes.
In that way, they claim Swedes to be racist and themselves to be on the anti-racist side, but the opposite is sometimes true. Sociology professor Masoud Kamali of Iranian descent and his subordinates pushed out other researchers from the 2004 parliamentary commission on integration because they were native Swedes and thus by default could not do research on structural racism in Sweden, a fact that was taken for granted by Kamali but not by other social scientists. Socialist minister of integration Mona Sahlin obeyed his call for absolute powers over the commission, enrolled almost only of immigrant scholars and dismissed the Swedish professors.
Sadly the idea of Sweden as a racist country prevails within the left, socialist, green and in multicultural advocacy groups with the result that some easily fooled immigrants give up hopes of being integrated and start hating Swedes. A change in labour policy that may give work to jobless immigrants is attacked for being inherently racist. No jobs are better than low wages the multiculturalists argue.
The left wants to have even stricter rules for employers who now have to make diversity plans each year for ethnic and gender equality. Still the labour market is overregulated and Swedish employers behave very well in hiring people of non-Swedish origins.
But being dragged to court because you asked a prospective employee to shake your hand and fined $10 000 for doing so do not make employers happier to hire strangers. This happened to an employer who had a female manager that was rejected by a Muslim trainee who preferred to hold his had close to his heart as Muslims do in Muslims countries. She was fined for asking.
Most immigrants do not care about such nonsense and they are luckily in majority. A simple and imprecise but useful way to understand the field of discourses on migration and integration is to divide all immigrants residing in Sweden into four groups:
A – overwhelming majority of honest, working or work searching immigrants
B – disloyal minority, violent, trouble makers, fraudulent behaviour, criminal
C– self chosen spokesmen for all immigrants, multicultural and self- proclaimed “anti-racist”
D – immigrants that insist on universal rights and duties for all, yet proud of their foreign origins
A do not care much for C, who are defending B against A and D. Neither does A care much for D, But they are very concerned over B, their mostly younger family members who attack Swedes or other immigrants, throw stones at policemen and behave badly in school.
Some of B also are on welfare while working illegally somewhere, but that is a tricky area as there are some in A who are proud workers too, even if illegally. The possibility of someone from D starting a discussion about how badly B behaves may lead C to appeal to Godwin’s law and replace Hitler with Breivik and then the discussion and sanity ends. Godwin’s law states that anyone that can relate any political discussion to Adolf Hitler by using the trick of guilt by association has won. It is a joke abroad and online but reality in Sweden.
Months after the horrible Norwegian tragedy, any sensible discussion about problems around immigration lead C to attack D and all Swedes for implying support for Breivik and thus the meek Swedish journalists were silenced.
As a result of silenced discussions on problems with immigration in the left leaning media, Swedes have highest distrust of media reporting on immigration in EU. 60 % of all polled Swedes do not think they get reliable information from media compared to the average 40 % in EU.
Group D exists and does not form a homogenous group of journalists and intellectuals, but they are usually in favour of universal human rights and respect for individuals, against silly forms of multiculturalism and soft headed arguments.
When Swedes back down and do not take a fight, they defend Sweden, civic humanism and same rights and duties for all. Sometimes they are called racists, home niggers (husnegrer), Oreo cookies (brown outsides, white insides) Uncle Toms and islamophobes by C. Group A and B exist but not in media.
The vast majority of vocal immigrants either working in media or as activists/ politicians belong to C and are too many to mention. They have vast support in state television and radio, in academia and in the cultural pages of all newspapers including them with liberal- conservative editorial pages.
Swedish radical academics and journalists use group C as an alibi for their identity politics and hip radicalism, much like Palme and his generation used fighters in the anti-colonial struggles in Asia, Latin America and Africa, to make them feel the heat and strife of hardships for a while. On an American scale, the Swedish group C stand for old identity political multicultural world of Jesse Jackson, while group D is more with Barack Obama, who told black teenagers to study hard and their parents to shape up.
The cultural left and nationalists have more in common than they know. The cultural left is repressing every dissent by using the most Swedish of traits in public discourse, conformism. The nationalists want Sweden to live up to its cultural heritage which include conformism.
By insisting that everyone should share the ideals of multiculturalism (and a certain kind of feminism, share their income with others through high taxes, wear helmets when biking etc.) and keep quiet about problems related to large immigration, the left is being utmost Swedish. The more conservative Sweden democrats have found a secret ally in the public debate as they openly declare nostalgia for the 1930s Swedish socialist folkhem conformism and consensus seeking ideology. Besides conformism, the Sweden democrats defend economic protectionism which parts of the illiberal left does too. What distinguishes them is immigration.
Immigration to Sweden is hailed by the UN but that praise is for the legislation, not for the reality which is another game. It takes as mentioned on average seven years for male immigrants to land a job. Sweden receives more immigrants than similar countries.
Laws for entering and staying are very lax, but firm to adhere to international conventions when immigrants have committed a crime, their application for residence permit has been rejected or they have unclear national status. Sweden keeps sentenced criminals who have done their time in prison because no country wants them back, especially people coming from Africa and Middle East.
Still Swedes have high acceptance for new cultures and want to keep borders as open as possible, polls show. But acceptance is not enough. The combination of large immigration and lax legislation is problematic and will not be solved until all facts are on the table and open for discussion. Every sixth inhabitant in Sweden has foreign roots, some of them negative to more influx of immigrants, some accepting. Socialists have usually strong support in the immigrant population, but that has started to change
Karaveli 1997, Arnstberg 1998, Björkman et al 2006, Arnstberg 2008, Eriksson and Rennerfeldt 2009, Caesar 2010a and 2010b and Wager 2011. The last book contain reports from civil servants at the Migration Board who want illegalities, irregularities and mistakes to be known but dare not blow the whistle, thus all of them are anonymous. A pattern repeated since Huntford 1971 interviewed high placed government officials anonymously.
 Guillou 2010. Being an independent minded and hardworking journalist and former Maoist, now still left of the left party, he does not care much for feminism or silly mulitculturalism but defends working class values, harassed immigrants and personal integrity. Together with other independent socialist writers Leif GW Persson and Jan Myrdal, he has much influence in contemporary debates. Mostly for the better. Persson always, Myrdal rarely.
 Sandelin 2011.
 Tullberg 2011.
 Sveriges Riksdag. Konstitutionsutskottets Granskningsbetänkande, 1992/93. KU: 30. Del 1, p.104. See also Björkman et al 2006, p.66-73.
 In Sandelin 2012, p.39
 Sandelin 2012. p.15.
 Berman 2006.
 A potent mixture where the attackers’ respect for religious and cultural patriarchy lead to tolerance for misogyny, as in debates over honorary killings where the mentioning of the concept of honour being related to feudal traditions in East Africa and Middle East immediately lead to accusations of racism.
It took at least three lives of young people (Fadime Sandahl, Pela Atroshi and Abbas Rezai) and ten years until these traditional views could be discussed somewhat sensibly by Swedish politicians, researchers and journalists. Sweden has around two known honorary killings per year. Discussions on the merits of receiving immigrants that kill their own family members are heated and calling participants racist for discussing horrific traditions among immigrants rise the temperature to boiling point. Same mechanisms apply to debates on female genital mutilation, halal meat in schools, sharia law, Swedish identity, forced marriages and ethnic strife. Given the Swedish insistence on being kind and nice to all, especially downtrodden strangers, many native Swedes feel uncomfortable when facts are presented and conclusions drawn that imply stricter rules also for immigrants. See Rothstein 2006b for lack of constitutionally based social cohesion in multicultural Sweden and Johansson Heinö 2011 for overview of Swedish immigration debate.
 Borg 2006.
 Zaremba 2006, Rezania 2007, von Bahr 2011 and von Bahr 2012. In her latest report, von Bahr shows that Swedish employers are less likely to prefer hiring their own citizens than employers in Denmark, Norway, Canada and Germany.
 Diskrimineringsombudsmannan 2010.
 According to BRÅ 2005, the national Crime Prevention Agency, immigrants are twice as often sentenced. The 2005 report is for 1997-2001 and the agency has not done same report after the large immigrations from Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia since.
 European Commission 2011.
 Nima and Tino Sanandaji, Harry Schein, Tomas Gür, Nima Dervish, Nyamko Sabuni, Maciej Zaremba, Dilsa Demirbag-Sten, Merit Wager, Mauricio Rojas, Hanif Bali, Alice Teodorescu, Boris Benulic, Sakine Madon, Arhe Hamednaca and Sara Mohammed among others, and globally, for example Salman Rushdie and Kenan Malik. This group D and the anonymous group A will be part of making Sweden normal and actually save the nation along with more sane, hardworking and aspiring immigrants.
Denna text på Avpixlat
Hur många muslimer som bor i Sverige och flyttar hit de närmaste åren är viktigt att beräkna, liksom deras födelsetal och de svenskar som dör bort. Innan jul skrev Claes Lönegård i SvD (18/12, 2016) att svenskarna överskattar andelen muslimer i Sverige. Tillfrågade svenskar av undersökningsföretaget PEW uppgav att 17 % är muslimer, trots att de egentligen är 4, 6 % menade SvDs journalist Clas Lönegård segervisst.
”Det SvD inte redovisar är att siffran 4, 6% är från 2010, det vill säga att den är drygt sex år gammal, långt innan asylkrisen 2015. SvD uppgav artikeln i december 2016 att 4, 6% var muslimer i Sverige. I verkligheten ligger siffran alltså mellan 7, 1% – 8, 2% beroende på vilka man inkluderar i kalkylen. Det är en felberäkning på 2, 5 – 3, 4 procentenheter”.
En ekonom och affärsman, Pekka Rousu har hört av sig till mig och gjort egna beräkningar som redovisas nedan. Jag som reporter har inte dragit fram siffrorna och jag välkomnar andra ekonomer att kontrollera dem, liksom ”Affe Karlsson”, Jan Tullberg och Gunnar Sandelin.
Min källa Pekka Rousu börjar med liksom Morpeus att avfärda SvDs beräkningar, men han hittade fel även i den gode Project Morpeus blogg:
Felen är dessa grupper inte inkluderats:
- födda barn
- döda äldre
- sk ”arbetskraftsinvandring”
- anhöriga övriga
Därför är SvD:s siffra på 7 % redan den för låg enligt min källa. Hur hög är den egentligen då undrar ni?
Vi går först bakåt till år 2010 och utgår från PEWs statistik som då var korrekt.
TIO MILJONER 2017
Om vi börjar 2010 och antar att PEW Research hade rätt om antalet muslimer i Sverige. Vi var i Sverige då 9 miljoner och här fanns en halv miljon muslimer. Alltså en av 20 var muslim och 8, 5 miljoner var icke-muslimer. Dvs ca 5 % muslimer.
Kollar vi sedan på befolkningsökningen fram till 2017 så har vi blivit 10 miljoner. Det föddes 840 000 barn och det dog 630 000 under dessa 7 år. Det förklarar 210 000 personer av miljonen vi ökade med nyligen. Varifrån kommer de övriga 790 000 människorna?
Svaret är förstås invandring, vilket medges till och med officiellt och som något positivt. Det är enkelt att se i en tabell hur många som invandrat till Sverige varje år och från vilka länder. Mycket riktigt var det ca 800 000 som kom under dessa 7 år och grovt räknat var 80 % av dessa muslimer, dvs 640 000 personer
Om vi antar att de muslimer vi hade 2010 ännu lever (500 000) och så lägger vi vill 640 000 muslimer så blir det 1, 14 miljoner. Det blir 11 %. Redan där hamnar PEW och SvD fel.
Barnen som föddes var också delvis muslimer vilket är en felkälla som inte tas med fullt ut, så 11 % är lågt räknat. Inklusive total invandring dess, även om det är ett felaktigt antagande med 80 % muslimer, så är det dagens Sverige snarare 9 – 13 % som är muslimer än knappt 5 % som SvD skrev innan jul.
År 2000 var andelen muslimer 1 %, dvs 1 av 100
År 2010 var det 5 %, dvs 1 av 20
År 2017 var det 11 %, dvs 1 av 9
År 2020 blir det 17 %, dvs 1 av 6, utifrån känd information
År 2025 blir det 25 %, dvs 1 av 4, beroende på vald politik
Den muslimska befolkningen idag och invandrande muslimsk befolkning är ung och barnafödande. Av 9 miljoner icke-muslimer idag är det minst 5 miljoner för gamla för att få barn, men inte bland muslimska familjer.
Muslimska kvinnors nativitet är högre än etniska svenskor. Försiktigt räknat så föder en muslimsk kvinna 2, 5 jämfört med svenskornas 1, 5 barn (en siffra som kan sjunka vid social oro).
Muslimska kvinnor föder barn tidigt i livet (18 – 30 år) och svenskor sent (30 – 34 år). På ett sekel föds fyra generationer muslimer och tre generationer svenskar.
Hur stor invandring blir i framtiden från muslimska länder är omöjligt att veta, men gissningsvis önskar befintliga muslimer få hit fler muslimer till Sverige och absolut inte kristna invandrare.
Här finns mer belägg för siffrorna där nativitet och mortalitet tas. Kort sammanfattning:
äldre icke-muslimska etniska svenskar dör undan och ersätts av yngre muslimer med högt barnafödande.
Asylinvandring 2010 – 2017
Enligt Migrationsverket fick 215 000 fick uppehållstillstånd mellan dessa år. Räkna med att 80 % är muslimer.
172 000 muslimer
Anhöriginvandring 2010 – 2017
69 000 (32 % av asylsökare samma period) och 80 % muslimer.
55 000 muslimer
Barn födda till föräldrar med PUT 2010 – 2017
Migrationsverket uppger bara 35 000 föräldrar och om 80 % är muslimer och om alla deras barn antas ha samma religion som sina föräldrar blir det
28 000 muslimer
Anhöriga övriga 2010 – 2017
Detta är sk kärleksinvandring. Den var under dessa år 134 000 personer, så det är ett betydande antal men inkluderar även att muslimer i Sverige tar in muslimska makar utifrån. Går man igenom nationaliteter bland dessa återfinns inte bara från typiska muslimska länder utan från Thailand och Ryssland. En uppskattning att 50 % av dem är muslimer, alltså
67 000 muslimer
Arbetstagare och anhöriga till dessa 2010 – 2017
Dessa var 101 000 arbetare och 61 000 anhöriga. Det har alltid funnits ett antal experter och udda omständigheter som gjort att vissa flyttat till Sverige. Men de tal vi haft efter att Alliansen tog makten 2006 är exceptionella. En muslimsk invandrare som äger en pizzeria kan anställa två personer från hans hemland genom att ansöka om arbetskraftsinvandring. I princip är alla arbetskraftsinvandrare lågkvalificerad arbetskraft. I snitt är det 15 000 arbetare per år. Det finns några tusen riktiga arbetskraftsinvandrare som är i Sverige i några år för att det är nödvändigt och sedan åker hem, men för det stora flertalet så gäller inte detta. 67 % av dessa söker asyl i Sverige inom några år så vad det handlar om är förtäckt asylinvandring. Det finns massor av arbetsgivare som säljer sådana intyg så människor får komma till Sverige. De söker de asyl och stannar i Sverige. 67 % av 162 000 är 109 000. Andelen muslimer är ju 80 % av desssa så det blir
87 000 muslimer
Inne i asylprocessen 2017
Dessa finns inte som invandrare i Sverige utan de är på väg in i systemet. De är 122 000.
Beviljandegraden för asyl har tidigare varit ca 35 – 45 %, men sedan Sverige skärpte gränskontrollen hösten 2015, så har procenten nu gått upp mot 75 % och bland muslimer upp mot 85%. Vi antar att 90 % av dem är muslimer och att 85 % får stanna så det blir
93 000 muslimer
Andel som stannar illegalt när de fått avslag eller hoppar av asylprocessen kan vara minst 100 000 inklusive de som stannat sedan år 2000. Om 75 % av dem är muslimer
75 000 muslimer
Födda barn i Sverige 2010 – 2017
Antalet födda barn är inte svårt att få fram, men andel muslimska barn är värre. Det föddes 120 000 barn per år dessa sju år och det blir 840 000 barn. Sedan tidigare vet vi att barn födda av invandrade föräldrar med PUT var 28 000. Muslimer är ca 10 % av befolkningen men de är i barnafödande ålder.
Gällande svenskar så är sex av de nio miljonerna inte i barnafödande ålder då de flesta är för gamla. Muslimska kvinnor föder barn 18 – 34 år och föder minst 2,2 barn per kvinna. Det innebär att det blir fyra generationer muslimer per sekel. Svenska kvinnor föder mellan 28 – 39 år ca 1,5 barn. Det innebär tre generationer per sekel. Så per sekel blir det väldigt många fler muslimer än svenskar.
I barnafödande åldrar så är andelen muslimer 20 %. Det innebär med mitt nativitetsantagande att muslimer föder 27% av barnen. Alltså kan det bli 227 000 muslimer till (andelen muslimska barn kan vara både högre och lägre, alla barn följer inte föräldrareligionen och vad som dessutom trasslar till beräkningar är att det finns blandäktenskap etc.)
Antal muslimer i Sverige 2017:
Inflyttade sedan 2010 515 000
Asylinvandring 172 000
Anhöriga asylinvandring 55 000
Födda PUT-barn 28 000
Kärleksinvandring 67 000
Arbetskraftsinvandring 87 000
Bifall inom asylprocessen 93 000
Födda muslimska barn 227 000
Illegala i landet 75 000
Totalt blir det 1 255 000 muslimer.
Enligt folkräkningen är vi 10 miljoner så det blir 12,5 % muslimer. Alltså 8,8 miljoner icke-muslimer och 1, 25 miljoner muslimer.
FRAMTIDEN 2017 – 2020
Antal döda är i huvudsak etniska svenskar över 75 år och blir ca 270 000 fram till 2020.
270 000 färre svenskar
Anhöriga till människor som redan kommit till hit måste läggas till fram till år 2020. Migrationsverket har sagt en siffra på ca 350 000 just nu. Den beräkningen beror på politiska beslut den kommande tiden och hur man tillämpar lagen och hur praxis är i verkligheten. Av dessa 350 000 är minst 80 % muslimer så ytterligare
280 000 muslimer.
Myndigheterna talar om allt från 50 000 – 100 000 per år. Under 2016 sökte 35 000 asyl. Antar att det blir 35 000 per år fram till 2020 och att de är till 80 % muslimer och att 80 % får stanna. Det blir
67 000 muslimer
Anhöriga till de nya asylsökarna
Vi säger 25% anhöriga så det blir
17 000 muslimer
Den kan antas ligga kvar på samma nivå (runt 18 000/år) och att de är 50 % muslimer. Det blir
27 000 muslimer
Sk arbetskraftsinvandring med anhöriga
Antar samma nivå som tidigare 7 år bakåt. 23 000/år och att 2/3 söker asyl och att 80% är muslimer. Det blir
37 000 muslimer.
Antal att det fortsätter på 120 000/år och att det är 27 % muslimska barn.
97 000 muslimer
Befolkning år 2020
Antal muslimer från 2017, 1 255 000 personer redan här
Anhöriginvandring till befintliga invandrare 280 000
Asylsökare 67 000
Anhöriga nya asylsökare 17 000
Kärleksinvandring 27 000
Arbetskraftsinvandring och anhöriga 37 000
Födda muslimska barn 97 000
Totalt antal muslimer 1 800 000
Sedan 2017, 8 800 000 personer
Döda 270 000 –
Födda barn 263 000 +
Anhöriginvandring till befintliga invandrare 70 000
Asylsökare 17 000
Anhöriga till nya asylsökare 4 000
Kärleksinvandring 27 000
Arbetskraftsinvandring 9 000
Summa icke-muslimer: 8 920 000
Totalt i Sverige 8 920 000 + 1 800 000 = 10 720 000 och 16,8 % muslimer
Andel muslimer i Sverige till 2050:
År 2000 1 %, dvs 1 av 100
År 2010 5 %, 1 av 20
År 2017 12 %, 1 av 8
År 2020 16 %, 1 av 6
År 2030 31 %, 1 av 3
År 2040 50 %, 1 av 2
År 2050 70 %, 2 av 3
ANDEL MUSLIMER I ÅLDERSINTERVALL
Det säger något om ett samhälle hur det ser ut och fungerar. Antaganden nedan för 2017 och 2020 för dessa åldersintervall bör göras, men har inte fullföljts av Pekka Rousu:
0- 6 år, förskola, fritids, barn
7 – 18 år, skola
18 – 30 år, ålder muslimska kvinnor föder och börjar rösta
31 – 39 år, ålder svenska kvinnor föder
40 – 63 år, slutet av arbetstiden
63 – 75 år, pensionärer som inte behöver så mycket sjukvård
75 – 95 år, åldringar som behöver mycket hjälp
Tiden efter 2020 går tillväxten muslimer snabbare. Muslimska kvinnor föder barn i yngre ålder. Muslimska kvinnor föder fler barn/kvinna. Den muslimska befolkningen i barnafödande ålder är mycket hög andel.
Om vi tänker oss tiden från 2020 till 2040. Vilka kommer då att dö? Jo, mestadels de som då är 70 – 95 år. Dessa är idag 67 – 92 år. I den åldern finns i princip 0 muslimer. Om vi säger att det är 90 000/år så kommer det att dö 1,8 miljoner svenskar som är icke-muslimer. I denna ålderskategori har vi i princip enbart etniska svenskar (och en och annan från Finland, Grekland och Turkiet).
Pensionärer år 2040 kommer att vara nästan enbart etniska svenskar födda innan 1980 och nästan inga muslimer. Hur kommer betalningsviljan i Sverige se ut då för pensionärer? Hur mycket pension vill framtidens muslimer ge gamla svenskar? Hur mycket sjukvård tycker de dessa gamla svenskar är värda? Eftersom det kommer att råda klara motsättningar i samhället mellan muslimer och icke-muslimer så är frågan relevant.
Eller är det möjligt att barn till muslimska föräldrar inte blir muslimer? Är det dessutom så att majoriteten av de muslimer som flyr hit vill inte återupprätta sina dysfunktionella muslimska samhällen? En del tyder på att detta gällt tidigare, dvs att sekulära muslimer och religiöst ointresserade barn varit de flesta av muslimerna i Sverige. Men sedan 1990 har muslimer ersatt arbetare som socialdemokratisk väljarbas (Kenan Maliks bok Från fatwa till jihad, DN 2009 ), högljudda muslimska grupper tagit plats i debatten (Ivar Arpi, Timbro 2014 ) och förorter islamiserats (Nalin Pekgul, Fokus 2017).
De muslimska generationer som kom till Europa efter 1945 var sekulära, men deras barn och barnbarn, liksom de senaste decenniernas muslimska invandrare, är inte det. Dessutom är de väldig, väldigt många fler.
Jan Sjunnesson och Pekka Rousu
Två Facebookvänner rapporterar om läget i Stockholms socialförvaltning och polisväsende. Se min anteckning
En socialsekreterare som är min Facebookvän skriver anonymt:
Kort inslag i kroatiska statstelevision om svensk migrationspolitik. Längre intervju i vår 2017
HRT Kroatien (ca 15 min in)
När en rullstolsbunden kvinna gruppvåldtogs i Visby 2 okt 2016 uppstod en debatt om de fem utländska gärningsmännen. Många ville hjälpa kvinnan och en insamling anordnades kvickt. Generösa privatpersoner skänkte 140 000 kr på 10 dagar.
Jag och teamet vid Svensk Webbtelevision for till Visby 15 okt för att tala med kvinnans anhöriga och överlämna kvitto på insamlingen.
Vi talade även med Camilla Sandelius som organiserat protester och nattvandringar, och med pseudonymen Julia Caesar, som skrivit en rykande och lysande krönika om gruppvåldtäkten.
Se filmen på www.swebbtv.se
”The EU has failed in their task of safeguarding our national economies and our safety, by failing to protect our outer borders. As Victor Orban, one of the few real leaders in the EU, said in his recent excellent speech – and I quote:
‘Immigrants are now not just pounding on our doors, but are breaking them down on top of us. This is the destruction of our countries, our lives and the lives of your children, your grandchildren. It is essentially genocide.’
I am asking you to remember what Sweden used to be. How beautiful and how safe and that it was a country to be proud of, a country hailed worldwide as an almost perfect society.
Now Muslims and even returning jihadi warriors are flooding your country, demanding money and preferential treatment, while they are raping the Swedish women. Roma people are literally shitting all over your parks and backyards and robbing you blind.
We stand here because we now see with open eyes that we cannot wait for our governments to fix the issue because they are not going to. We need to tell people that it is OK to be angry. But use that anger constructively and with precision. No more political correctness nonsense and no more polite talk.
You need to show that Sweden has had enough! The time has come when you must either fight for your country or lose it forever!”
”It is a great honour to again be standing here before you and especially on this day “international women’s day”. I hope I don’t take up too much of your time because it is a subject about which I have much to say.
I stand here because strong Scandinavian women, the REAL feminists, have fought long and hard for equality, in a struggle that has been going on for almost 150 years in every sphere of our society. I love my life here in Scandinavia – in Europe – as a women and I feel incredibly privileged and grateful for the twist of fate that allowed me to be born into a society where I can freely stand here before you and speak my mind. But not everybody has the privilege to freely voice their opinion – even if they DO live in our Scandinavian countries!
So…we are here today to take off the veil. There are, however, other and different veils that need taking off other than the physical veil. What I would like to talk about today is taking off the mental and spiritual veil that keeps millions of women in perpetual slavery, misery and subjugation or in the case of western feminists creates in them a veil of ignorance as to the plight of their sisters, not just in the Western world but worldwide.
We are in the midst of a cultural battle and one which shows itself in many and various ways – in especially womens lives.
About 8 years I heard a man savagely beating his wife from 4 floors away.
Filled with anger, I yelled at him to stop by saying I SEE WHAT YOU ARE DOING!
He stuck his head out the window and replied in broken Danish “FUCK DIG, DIN DANSKE LUDER, JEG SKAL KOMME EFTER DIG” (FUCK YOU, YOU DANISH WHORE…I’M GOING TO COME AFTER YOU)
He then slammed the window shut and closed the curtains but the screaming stopped.
What struck me about it was that he felt no shame about what he was doing – he just showed anger. How dare I challenge him! He was reacting, as I now know, in quite a normal way for a man from a paternal culture where women are worth little.
I’m afraid however that many would not have reacted. Out of “cultural respect”. We aren’t really supposed to stick our nose in other people’s “business”.
I am here to say that we NEED to stick our noses in THAT type of business and we need to say NO, I will not accept it. We must NOT close our eyes and ears nor windows and doors and think that we have no right to interfere because it is another culture that we have to respect!
A culture where it is legitimate to beat up on women deserves no respect.
And yet, that is exactly what we are expected to do.
We do not and MUST not in any way respect that type of primitive and violent behavior whether it be mental or physical. It is HER right – whether she be from another culture or our own – to demand OUR respect for her life, liberty and well-being and to expect our help – AND our interference. I am not sure how much my interference helped this particular woman but at least she KNEW that there was somebody who DID care about her well-being! And that is worth something.
And here is the real heart of my speech. I ask you, where ARE the collective howls of outrage from women?
Why DO we minimize and turn a blind eye to the examples of misogyny that we see ever more in our society? And why aren’t more non-muslim feminists speaking up about violence against women – ALL women – not just in muslim-majority countries but right here at home?
Why do we ignore the terrible fate of some women who live right here in our own societies. Not just muslim women but our own indigenous Scandinavian women who are, as we speak, being harassed, and groped and raped at an unprecedented rate by Islamic men who have no cultural respect for women. It has become, horrifyingly, almost a normal thing to read in the newspaper…oh well just another woman raped, or stabbed, or beaten! More of the same – every damned day!
I am going to read to you a short story I read recently on a blog – by a young muslim woman who is questioning islam:
I am a 19 year old female who lives with two Palestinian Muslim parents. Since I was a little girl, I remember the taste of Islam in my mouth was a sour one. I would have nightmares about Hell and I felt a crippling fear towards God. I was told my nightmares were a warning to stay faithful and that my fear in God was only devotion.
When I was 14, I attended a wedding. The next morning I woke up very sick, and my mother was convinced that I’d received ”evil eyes” from the other guests. For the next year, I went through a severe depression and instead of getting proper help, I was bombarded with religious ”medicine”; I’d been to at least 4 sheikhs who promised to ”heal” me through the will of God. It was all very unsettling and scary for me as a kid and by my 17th birthday, I had become obsessed with researching Islam and the theory of religion as a whole.
For the first time, I felt relief to be wrong, that my parents were wrong. Last month, I openly discussed religion with my mother and father and younger sister, and they rejected almost everything I showed them, barely listening to me, even though I’d been decent enough to listen to them. Their passive aggressiveness turned into full-fledged wrath, and I was told to shut up and never bring this up again by my father while my mother cried and screamed about how her oldest daughter was a ”blasphemy” and she was embarrassed to be my mother and how I was going to send them both to Hell for my selfishness, yada yada.
Things still aren’t good, I am now dealing with them assuming I’ve become an apostate to ”whore” around, do drugs, and abandon them, because that’s what faithless people do – what Godless women do. A woman of Islam is obeying and quiet and compliant and I am none of these things. They have told countless times I am the worst type of woman. As a woman, however, I am more than ever feeling the effects of Islamic misogyny, and as their daughter, I feel forgotten, like the person I’ve always been has been thrown away and replaced with the image of an adulteress demon riddled with disease and perverseness.
I am still me, just not what they wanted. I feel like any confidence I’ve had in my decisions before is gone now, because I don’t want them to think I am doing something bad, even if I’m not. Even though I am so angry with them, their anger towards me affects me more. I feel like I turned my backs on them and that I put my mother, especially, through a lot. I don’t really know where to go now. How do I battle the emotions of guilt with the desire to pursue a life and identity of my own?
That was the story of a young muslim girl who WANTS to be a part of our society.
A huge number of women are imprisoned in this way under a misunderstood government sanctioned politically correct cloak of cultural “sensitivity”. There is no way of out of this jail for these women unless we become aware and help give them the key to get out.
There are many women living under Islamic oppression who WANT to be a part of our society – who have seen it as an opportunity to gain a measure of freedom when they come here.
Imagine then their distress when they find that they have to live in Islamic enclaves and become even MORE Islamic! To live even MORE restrictive lives than they did even in their homeland – because their families are afraid that they might become westernized!
And then imagine the ultimate distress…that not even Scandinavian women care about their situation! They see and hear these selv-indulgent insane modern Scandinavian feminists who do nothing but wallow around in their self-righteousness.
I call them false feminists – pseudo-feminists – because they have made it abundantly clear that they don’t care about what happens to other women, they care about themselves and their own liberty – only. Never mind that other people get trampled in the process, men, women…who cares. So long as they can stand, pioius, self-righteous and holy and proclaim themselves a proud FEMINIST!
It is a label that I today would be embarrassed to wear. I see them making victims of themselves. I see them passively aggressively trying to claim that they are so hard done by – in order to get special status, protection and attention. I am woman – hear me roar. It is not about equality – it is about power – at the cost of others.
Like Frankenstein, todays feminism has become a parody of the real living thing. A real “feminist” is somebody who is first and foremost a human being. It is a person who can look beyond her own little miniscule pond and see the other fish as well. They have forgotten what we are fighting for, not just as women, but as people. A collective freedom. They have become selfish and they swim about in their monstrous puddle of perceived persecution and insult. They attack their own, even their sisters who just want to be home-makers and good parents, they attack men for…well, for just being MEN! They waste their time on trivialities and stupidities – like insisting that there is no he or she and that boys must play with dolls.
Even as we stand here with the greatest threat to humanity and womanhood and womens welfare – EVER – the islamisation and the increasing violence in our societies – they still wallow in their own self-indulgent pond, swimming in egoistic circles around themselves. And all the while there are women out there who truly WANT freedom, thirst for it, hunger for it – but who do not know how to break free. Do not have the resources, do not have the advice and help needed.
Many of these women have come to our country in the hope of a free life, a life of liberty. Do we hear about feministic solidarity and the fight for them?
I hear nothing but thundering embarrassing silence.
I say to you feminists of Scandinavia. You have forgotten what solidarity between people and between women means. You are letting your sisters down while you navel gaze and holler up about your own rights and privileges. You are demanding concessions and squabbling about small insignificant issues while women are being raped, dying and their lives destroyed.
I am here to ask you to look into yourself and to look beyond yourself. I am here to ask you to listen to and learn from women who are WORTH looking up to, listening to and learning from. Women with REAL messages. We are talking about the REAL feminists who are trying to help other women out of their prisons – Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Mona Walter, Wafa Sultan, Sister Hatune, Hege Storhauge, Elmas Berke and thankfully so many more – and their voices need to be heard.
They don’t call themselves feminists – they call themselves THEMSELVES and they are too busy dealing with reality. They don’t mess about and boo hoo hoo with small personal issues in order to work their own narrative about how terribly cruel and how unequal it is for them.
The pseudo-feminists need a real god solid kick in the rear and we all need to wake up from our slumber and make some real changes and to focus on the REAL challenges.
We have to, for example, work toward making our laws reflect a TRUE equality for ALL regardless of gender AND culture. And not just equality for the western woman – but for those of other cultures who share their lives in our countries.
We have to be unafraid to talk about cultural differences and the unique challenges the muslim women live with – misogyny and violence in their culture and in their homes – which is so very much different from the small challenges that we western women face.
We also have to let them KNOW that we DO care about them and want to help them assimilate and gain their freedom. We have to be prepared to open our hearts and our doors to those women already here who WANT to be a part of our society. If we do not let them know that we are there for them they will not know where to go and what to do – other than the woman’s crisis centers. And we will have helped put them there.
We have to establish safe places where they can come and get REAL help in making a new life for themselves or to just get away from abusive families and husbands. We have to be not afraid to use the law against those who would keep them from realizing their lives as free women. This is a hard bit because we have to be unafraid to tell their families that they WILL be prosecuted, harshly, if they try to prevent these women from getting a new life. They have to know that they will be protected. Because they are worthy of our protection.
We have to challenge their culture. And we have to dare challenge the screwed up political correct elite who through their “goodness” are keeping the status quo. We have to challenge our fear of interfering in another culture.
But alas we do not! We accept that they are repressed because that is their culture and our politically correct environment has ensured that their culture must be respected at ALL costs!
Are we really OK with other women living in our society, right here at home, that are treated like second class citizens and who do not have the same rights as us?
They deserve no less freedom and equality than any Western born woman.
We need to try to help those muslim women who WANT a different life and help them achieve that freedom. The freedom they as human beings deserve and have a right to enjoy. We have to become aware of their situation and to stand together and to protect them and help them take off their own veils – even as we take off our mental ones.
And, if WE take the veil of ignorance off and un-blind ourselves – not only will they have a chance.
WE – will have a chance as well!”
The third is from the first demonstration by the Swedish group For Freedom/ För Frihet in Stockholm, April 2016.
”Today is a very special day. I am the leader of For Frihed Denmark and I have the great privilege of standing here with you at the first For Frihed Sweden demonstration. We stand here united because we are worried about what is happening in Europe today.
We stand also with the people of Europe, people who have had enough of the insanity, united now against the forces of fascism and, in particular, the fascist ideology of Islam. On the 25th of January I stood, together with Pegida UK, before an ocean of patriotic Germans in Dresden and signed the following declaration,The Prague Declaration, on behalf of For Frihed, Pegida Denmark. It is my hope that For Frihed Sweden also will join in the coalition.Link
The declaration reads as follows:
Conscious of the fact that the thousand-year history of Western Civilization could soon come to an end through the Islamic conquest of Europe, and conscious of the fact that the political elites have betrayed us, we, the representatives of the various nations of Europe, declare as follows:
We shall not surrender Europe to our enemies. We are prepared to stand and oppose political Islam, extreme Islamic regimes and their European collaborators.
We are prepared to risk our freedom, our property, our occupations and careers and perhaps also our lives as generations have done before us. It is our obligation to future generations.
We refuse to submit to a European central government. The regulations of the global elites have brought us poverty, unemployment, corruption, chaos and moral collapse. It is time this came to an end.
We respect the sovereignty of European nations and the rights of people in all European countries to govern their affairs as they see fit.
We hold it to be a sacred right of the citizens of all European countries to protect their borders and to decide which migrants they accept and which they do not accept into their countries.
We call attention to our common European roots, traditions and values, as well as to the historical alliances of our nations.
We are resolved to protect Europe, freedom of speech and all other civil liberties, as well as our common way of life together.
…Ladies and gentlemen!
A revolution has already taken place in the West – while we have been sleeping.
2000 years of reason has been replaced by cultural Marxism and Islamic supremacy in the form of political correctness. Cultural Marxism and cultural relativism is anathema and lethal to our civilization. We have seen it before in Europe as we have suffered Franco, Hitler, Mussolini and other totalitarian despots who have held millions of people in misery and contempt.
We in the west have ourselves swallowed a lethal cocktail of arrogance, ignorance, blindness – but most of all… self-loathing – a loss of self. It is a poisoned cocktail that has been killing us slowly and that is now showing itself by our confused and paralyzed attitudes to what is happening right around us – right now. We have lost our pride and forgotten what we are about. And I don’t think that we fully understand what it is we are fighting for. It is our freedom, our culture…our very lives.
What WE are doing is counterrevolutionary. This is a counter-revolution. We are attempting to right the wrong – we are striving to restore all that we have built and what has made the West the greatest, free’est and fairest place for humanity in all human history. We will turn back the clock and fight for the life that so many have died to create for us.
We are here to tell our politicians and the world that we will not be silent and let our beautiful Scandinavian and European culture laid to waste on the altar of political correctness and multiculturalism.
And on that note, I would like to thank you again for letting me address you here today.
Never surrender. ”
Years ago the proud lion of Sweden’s Nordic Battlegroup’s coat of arms sported an erect penis. Enraged about this symbol of masculinity, a group of female soldiers lodged a complaint with the European Court of Justice – and Swedish politicians in their – by then – already feminized ignorance – obligingly removed the offending member. The lion was emasculated. Literally castrated.
Now I can’t help but compare this emasculation to the state of Sweden today. Swedens men having now been neutered and feminized and rendered essentially harmless. Dangerously so, and clearly therefore, unable to protect Sweden’s women and young girls from the most horrific crisis of mass rape in modern times.
Feminism is no longer about women’s rights, it is a deliberate Marxist-Feminist machinery set about to bring down the temple of Western civilization.
Denmarks’ Iben Thranholm recently wrote – and it is hard to disagree with her: “The deficiency of masculinity in European culture renders it impotent in the face of the political and cultural chaos that has escalated along with growing immigration.” and I also fully agree with her when she wrote “The shortage of masculine virtues is the underlying cause of the immigration problems.
And in fact, this is what this invasion of mostly muslim migrants was meant to do.
Apologists for Islam claim that Islam has been hijacked by violent extremists. A 10 minute read of any Islamic scripture can show anyone who bothers to look that this is not true. Islamic jihad is central dogma to Islam.
In fact it is feminism that has been hijacked, along with modern Jewish and black rights groups. Hijacked by Marxists who are using the genuine historical inequities in women’s rights and black rights and even the Holocaust to push a communist agenda. Feminism today is anti-women as it shills for Islam, just as Soros-funded fake Jewish groups like “J street” pretend to be about Jewish rights while working against Israel, and “Black Lives Matter” work to create hatred between white and black people in America and beyond.
Sweden once, was outwardly both a people and a country who had a stellar reputation around the world. A people who had created the perfect society of equality and liberty. And it WAS so and it was lauded and celebrated across the Western world. A superpower of a sort. Not a military superpower, not even an economic superpower with weight to throw around. But a superpower of the sort of which legends are made. The perfect society made of equality, liberty AND economy – where everything went up into a perfect and higher whole.
A story a bit like King Arthur’s Camelot. A story almost too good to be true – and apparently so it has been.
And yet now, my sister country, Sweden, has cancer – and it is growing. Its love affair with Marxist hijacked Feminism has destroyed a healthy equalitarianism and made it sick with undeserved moral superiority such that now even Norway has said it will take no Swedish refugees when it finally collapses.
That cancer is called feminism. Or should I say the Cultural Marxism that has infected every level of your society because it certainly does not bear any resemblance to feminism as it once was – or meant to be.
As the original feminists, it should anger us all.
In its infancy and years after feminism meant something good. It meant equal rights and elevating women’s status in society – not as it is now, trouncing and squashing other people, whether it be men – or women of your own kind or others.
And oddly, Islam seems to be exempt from the Marxist-feminist attacks on our cultures.
And why is that?
Because modern feminism, like homosexual rights groups, alternative sexual practice advocacy groups, Black people groups, Jewish groups and others too numerous to name are in fact thieves of the moral authority of the groups they pretend to represent.
When what many of them really are, are George Soros-funded, culturally Marxist battering rams against classical civilization meant to use the moral authority we ourselves give to these groups due to past hardships, as weapons against our entire culture, legal system and organizing principles.
This is no less than a war being waged on our very essence.
Remember the words of famous Palestinian assassin and convert to Islam, Carlos the Jackal.
“Only a coalition of Marxism and Islam can defeat the United States”
We can substitute the Western World for the US and it still holds true.
Feminism used to mean standing by your rights as a woman, not emasculating your men and ignoring the plight of your sisters. It means equality, not superiority, it means a collective freedom, not just freedom for some.
Once upon a time strong Scandinavian women, the REAL feminists, fought long and hard for equality, and we, here in Scandinavia, achieved that equality.
The same was true across the world in democracies for various groups that had to fight for equality of opportunity in mainstream society. The American Civil Rights movement, for example under Dr. Martin Luther King. A man who today would be called a “far right extremist” by the contemporary left.
Once we start to understand that all these groups are the ones that are hijacked, and not Islam which in fact is being true to its historic principles of violent conquest and brutal control of other cultures and peoples, the comfort levels of modern Feminist groups and Islam make perfect sense.
The same as Black lives matter, who never cause problems when there is genuine injustice towards blacks because that would create a better society. They only cause riots when a police officer shoots a black man who might richly have had it coming – because that chaos will destroy our societies – and the very destruction of our societies is their goal.
This is no different than feminist groups creating enmity against Swedish natives while ignoring or minimizing the horrors against women, the mass rapes, the murders, of Swedish women by Muslims.
Swedish politician Barbro Sörman, recently said: “it’s far worse when Swedish men rape women than when migrants do it. Because, you see, when Swedes rape, they’re doing it despite believing in ”gender equality.”
And suddenly this makes perfect sense.
Modern identity groups are usurpers. Thieves of the moral authority of past injustices towards weaker groups in order to weaponize them against real liberals.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are not far right wing. Who knows what that even means any longer. We are those who want the West to prosper.
We are the real liberals like Thomas Jefferson and the great liberal philosophers of Europe like John Locke, Voltaire, Kant and James Mill.
Modern feminists are false feminists – pseudo-feminists – because they have made it abundantly clear that they don’t care about what happens to other women. Instead they are making women targets for Islamic aggression and then blaming the machinery of the most fair state in the history of the world for the results.
They are literally the sacrificers of women and the destroyers of women’s rights – along with all the rest of ours – if they win.
Enter Islam and you have a lethal cocktail.
Women all over Sweden are being harassed, groped and raped at an unprecedented rate by Islamic men who have no cultural respect for women. It has become a horror of normalcy. It barely even runs as news now and no longer is anyone surprised.
Women being raped, stabbed, groped, harassed by Muslims are countered by insane strategies like rubber bracelets in Swedish saying “tafsa inte” – “don’t grope me”. The insanity of this “strategy” is mindboggling – and about as useful as the German strategy of keeping migants at arms length.
Actually less useful as these Muslims for the most part do not read Swedish.
But really, if you need a bracelet to tell you not to sexually molest someone a bracelet is not going to do it and it is ludicrous to think so.
As it turns out, at the most recent music festival where 5 women were raped and 45 were sexualy assaulted, some migrant marauders were themselves wearing the “tafsa inte” wristbands!
We are in the midst of the worst possible situation, the perfect storm. While Marxists disguised as feminists have hounded and vilified, essentially castrated men, the invaders, mostly young muslim men have NOT forgotten their masculinity and they take, just like any invader, what they want – unimpeded. They see a soft nation of soft men and a soft government that is unwilling to tackle the problem.
We useful idiots, not recognizing the narrative of cultural Marxism using genuine human rights groups as weapons, have served them a smorgasbord of soft femininity – and there is nobody left to fight for you or to protect you or your culture and laws – because you have essentially taken those who COULD have fought the invaders out of the game!
Again, this was no accident.
Islam is the main weapon of the Marxists who would tear down our peaceful and cooperative civilization. Islam is the perfect killing machine.
And with its unholy alliance with Marxist hijacked Feminism, weaponized fake black rights groups and other mostly fake identity groups, we can now see the edge of the cliff.
It is also no accident that Leftists demand safe spaces against reason and opinions they do not share, but actively seek to destroy real safe spaces for women such as a girl’s bathroom, locker room or school shower.
Those genuine safe spaces for women have been destroyed by decree in much of the West already. And groups claiming to be feminist groups are partly responsible.
Again, this makes perfect sense when you realize the intention was to deconstruct us.
I am here to ask you to you need to take off the veil of ignorance and un-blind yourselves. I am asking you to stand strong on Swedish values and culture and to guard them with your life – to fight for them. And I am asking you to reject the false feminist narrative with their lies and manipulations and to take back your pride in your respective genders and to celebrate those differences. Because men and women ARE different! We have different strengths and abilities and they are both equally important and equally needed.
Ladies and gentlemen the time has come to make choices and these choices will have consequences.
Not just for ourselves, but our children and the conditions under which we as a people will exist.
The kinds of choices for which our ancestors have fought bloody wars.
This conflict is moving into a new phase. And we had better all be prepared to do our part whatever part that may be.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the madness needs to stop! Because a war is being waged against us – and we had best recognize this.
And, don’t take my word for any of this! Get curious, read about Cultural Marxism and read about the left’s agenda at deconstructing our societies, destroying our cultures and our values. All of our futures’ depend on this, especially since your government is pushing this destructive agenda. If our cultures and peoples are to survive it is time to wake up.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your time.”