This political thriller is set in 2020 in Delhi and Stockholm. Sara Sarasvati, a girl of 20 learns that her Swedish father whom she has had little contact with, is assassinated in Sweden. She flies to his funeral there, finds herself in the midst of media attention due to her father’s controversial political views. While in Sweden, she is persuaded to start study mining engineering there.
But her studies are interrupted by her unknown Swedish brother. Suddenly she is involved in international terrorism, ideological struggles and domestic Swedish politics. The new Swedish Prime Minister in year 2020 is a nationalist woman, born in Kurdistan who loves Sweden. A new kind of Swedish crime fiction with an intercultural twist and a racy daring plot. First chapter (scroll down for English).
I have now reached well beyond the age when Michel de Montaigne in 1571 took an early retirement to write his Essais, 39 years. In fact, the age when he died at 59, is just 4 years ahead for me. Parallels abound, personal and philosophical for me and Montaigne, but I want introduce another perspective on such an endeavour in midlife for gentlemen, that of the life-stage of the Forest- Dweller in ancient India who spends time dwelling over the ancient epic Mahabharata. A 21th century contemporary commentator of the Mahabharata will also appear, Shri Gurcharan Das.
In ancient Indian Vedic tradition and philosophy, life was divided in four stages in according to the ashrama system for devoted Hindus. First, one studies up until around 20 years, the student or Brahmacharya stage. Second, entering the householder’s stage, Grihastha, until around 45 years. Third, Vanaprastha stage of the hermit in the forest until around 65 years. Fourth and last, the Sannyasa stage of total reclusion with intention to spiritual liberation, Moksha.
Me at 55 years in the 21th century and Montaigne at 39 in the 16th century enter our Vanaprastha stages too, where we look back at our lives, still with ties to family and careers but preparing for the final stage and death. Montaigne sought his role models from Epicurean, Skeptic and Stoic philosophers in ancient Greece and Rome, which I find familiar and useful, but the ancient Indian traditions are also interesting for Western middle-aged middle class men like me and my readers. The forest-dweller of Vanuprastha, which literally means forest (vana) and going to (prastha), is satisfied with what life has brought him materially, as the affluent Montaigne was, and lives on as little as possible. In reality, few people can do this well unless they have had a good life materially and stems from a learned or well-to do family for generations. There is such a forest-dweller today in 21st century India, Gurcharan Das.
Indian businessman Gurcharan Das took an early retirement at age 51 after a life as a prominent businessman after 30 years. He comes from a good family in western Punjab, now in Pakistan, and made a career with a multinational corporation after been to Harvard, studying philosophy under John Rawls. In 1994 he decided to devote his life to writing and intellectual pursuits, such as heading the liberal think tank Centre for Civil Society in New Delhi. I met him a few times while working under him at the think tank, and later read his auto-biographical novel A fine family, but foremost his 2009 moral and scholarly treatise The difficulty of being good: on the subtle art of dharma.
This contemporary Indian Montaigne has a similar taste for ancient texts but the choice is the Hindu epic Mahabharata, rather than Seneca’s aphorisms or Herodotus’ stories. Das went back to USA in 2002 for an “academic holiday”, where he studied as a young man, now to University of Chicago and studied the classical Sanskrit text with the best Mahabharata scholars in the world. As a businessman and a concerned citizen, Das was distraught by the moral failures of the global financial system in the first decade of the new millenium. His attempt was to wrestle some old but still worthwhile truths about mankind which would enable him to better understand both Western and Eastern ways of dealing with tough decisions, moral boundaries and how to be good.
Like with Montaigne in 1572, a certain melancholy got Das started. The two see more tragic wisdom in tales of wars, horrors, superstition, deceit and such in epics like The Iliad and Odysseus, and the Mahabharata, than in philosophical treaties. Das comments on the two classical tragic war epics, Western and Eastern:
“The Iliad is bloodthirsty, driven by anger and violence. The Mahabharata is just as gory, but it questions the violence. The first word in the Iliad is menin, rage, as Homer asks the Muse to sing about the ‘wrath of Achilles’. The Bhagavadgita’s [central chapter in the Mahabharata] first word is dharma-kshetre, ‘field of righteousness’, signalling that this is no ordinary was enacted on a battlefield; it is also a war of dharma in the conscience of each human being” 
Dharma means truth, way, duty, goodness, law – what is good in the same sense as Aristotle and Plato meant it. The former’s concept of virtue is similar to dharma, the latter’s search for righteousness is also included in dharma.
Although the Essais are a kind of scholarly work albeit very personal and almost private, whereas the Mahabharata is not, if Indian readers forgive me for excluding the esoteric-spritual Bhagavadgita chapter (which was commented upon by Fichte, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Emerson and Thoreau in 19th century), I do think the thoughts of the French gentleman and speculations by ancient Indian sages are interesting to compare. Das’ study The difficulty of being good is the best application so far of Western philosophical and ethical ideas and traditions to the Mahabharata, a lot suggested by his friend and colleague Martha Nussbaum, by way of Hume, Kant and Rawls.
For non-Indian readers a short introduction to the story of the Bharata family wars, as compiled in the Maha Bharata (the Great Bharata). Two closely related warrior families in northern India become enemies to each other after a series of wrong decisions, deceit, envy and sense of duty. Five brothers who share one wife have the god Krishna on their side (an incarnation/avatar of the celestial god Lord Vishnu) against their cousin who has more armies and wealth behind him. After losing a game of dice the five brothers are forced into exile for 12 years but come back with revenge after much deliberation by their leader Yudhishthira who is committed not to use violence.
In the end the god Krishna persuades him and especially his brother Arjuna to do what is right and true dharma, which is to fight the oppressing cousin Duryodhana. After a war with many magical incidents, the five brothers win. But like the ancient Greek heroes felt after bloodshed, the victory does not feel entirely right. The brothers fought their own grandfather, their cousins, and even one brother, although they did not know it. Looking out over the corpses, the leader Yudhishthira who is also a spiritual scholar of the ancient Vedas, a brahmin, just as he is of warrior caste, a kshatriya, wants to give up what he fought for and become a recluse, to enter the melancholy Vanaprashta stage in life. Krishna admonishes him, calls him selfish and ungrateful to the team that fought against the oppressors. None of them are satisfied with being recluses again.
The victorious leader Yudhishthira understands finally what he needs to do as a king, and enters the palace throne, giving out positions to his brothers and comrades in arms and thus reigning gracefully for 36 years. The god Krishna who persuaded him not to follow a purely spiritual path gets accidentally killed. A remarkable ending but in line with the frail existences of the epic’s heroes.
No one is entirely evil or good. Characters behave as promiscuously as the Greek gods did during Homer’s and Aeschylus’ times. What differs is their reasoning openly about moral and metaphysical in the midst of action. The reluctant non-violent king Yudhishthira is obviously a dharma king, an enlightened despot that understands the role of violence in his reign, but only as a last resort. Even violence must be used to defend dharma, or the good in the world. Striking is that the deity Krishna needs to twice persuade humans not to be overly spiritual and unworldly, but take up arms and execute royal powers.
Krishna teaches the worldview of being in the world but not of the world. To act one must, as a householder, father, in working life etc., but do not think for a second that this world is all there is. Krishna shows his friend Arjuna how life starts, grows and stops, how generations follow one by one through life and death, and that the questions of meaning in life, man’s place in the universe, love and honour, duty and dharma, will always be there. To do one’s duty is to do the needful, as the colonial Indian English expression has it, with compassion. Only needs will be an animal life, but only compassion will get similarly wasted.
But how does we know what to do ? What is our duty ? Fairly easy in India where the warrior caste fights and the priests chant, as the impression could be from reading the Mahabharata. But even there people have choices. Duty can be also thought in a more universal sense, which runs alongside the sense from caste divisions and traditions. Noteworthy is the beautiful Drupadi who is shared by five husbands. Some characters also change sexes which make even questions of what men and women must do extraordinary. The toughest warrior of the victorious Pandava brothers, Arjuna, teaches dance and music to the court ladies when he is disguised as an eunuch. In the battlefield he is at first the most hesitant though having all sorts of magical powers and weapons.
Duty implies virtues, which in the Indian epic is what most characters strive for but few accomplish. Even the saintly Yudhishthria tells a kind of lie, concealing the truth of who has dies by mixing same name for an enemy’s son and an elephant. He is remorseful of this but appears still more holy than Lord Krishna who uses tricks to win and never excuses himself. He refers instead to a reasoning of means-to-ends that any business executive would appreciate. For me as for Gurcharan Das, Krishna is not the main heroic character to follow but the anti-hero Yudhishthria.
Aristotelian virtue ethics seem consistent with the ancient Indian concepts at about the same time, 400 B.C. The careful steering through a middle way between compassion and strength through violence is honoured by both. Forbearance, prudence and philosophical wisdom are more evident in Aristotle, who probably used his Nicomachian Ethics as lecture notes and not as an never- ending tale of wars and heroes, gods and human failures.
For someone like Monsieur Michael de Montaigne, if we return to his 17th century tower, ancient Greek virtues were much cherished and pondered upon. But he did not make himself into a French Renaissance gentleman by repeating the building of character and relying on virtues. Rather his adventure was to find in himself the faults (and farts) of precisely those virtue ethics. One should be courageous in battles, on horseback, in conversation (which probably was his best genre) and courts. His role models from Rome are Stoic where he is not. A modern individual in premodern times, or even postmodern as French philosopher J-F Lyotard once dubbed his fellow countryman, M. de Montaigne.
The only character in the Mahabharata that equals Montagine is Yudhishthira. Though they chose opposite ways, Montaigne going in to inner exile leading a Western Vanaprastha stage in life, while Yudhishthira takes on the throne as king, albeit a dharmic and therefore good king, they both are melancholic and remorseful at middle age. None of them are satisfied really. Montaigne finds he has failed his philosophical heroes and Yudhishthira ponders over his violent actions. Life was and is not better than this they seem to say. What unities them further is their truthfulness to their experiences and ambitions for leading truthful lives. Montaigne seems to miss his public life with all its mishappens, not being satisfied with his ancient books as friends. Yudhishthira is reluctant ruler who longs for recluse, but does his duty no matter what he feels. Or he feels he must do his duty as king and is convinced that it is for the benefit of all. Maybe not for himself but for the kingdom, his kins and the protection of dharma. He even states after being lectured by his wise uncle Bhishma about the need for a king to use violent force in order to protect the innocent,
“O Lord, the rod of punishment that reaches everywhere with the tremendous fiery energy is the best thing for all living things”
Melancholy anti-heroes Montaigne and Yudhishthira had both been exposed to death, murder, wars as responsible rulers, yet keeping distance to their gruesome experiences. In the end, both of them continue to pursue their respective philosophical and spiritual developments. They persevere. In fact, the name Yudhishthira means ”steady in war”, which is something he was not from the beginning but became. Montaigne’s perseverance is creating an open reflective and honest gentilhomme of himself. Their lives have taught them a kind of duty to do what is right irrespective of circumstances. An imperative to do good that has been tremendously hard for them to follow. Easier for Montaigne for sure, but he has a minute eye for all his failed ambitions that Yudhishthira does not tell us. Both of them want to lead a peaceful life where one does what one should do as any carpenter would do with a saw and a plank. The trouble with them is their intellectual abilities that questions their duties and wants to find out why something needs to be done. They would make sorry carpenters.
 Bharat is also the first name for India, still officially in use. Persians called the people along the Indus Valley Hindus and their country India, but that was later. For Hindu religious purposes Bharat is used.
 Krishna’s reasoning with Arjuna who hesitates to fight his own cousins is the theme of the Bhagavadgita chapter, the Song of God (Bhagvan). Gandhi, Aurobindo and Tilak used the Gita in the fight against the British colonial rule in the first half of the 20th century. I read first the Gita in Arkansas, USA, 1976, of all places.
 This reasoning, repetitions and the bewildering family linkages (where charcters change names like in Russian novels) make the story very long, sometimes boring and quite complicated, much like the Bible. R.K. Narayan’s condensed version is 180 pages long, whereas the original texts make up 18 volumes.
 The Mahabharata quoted in The difficulty of being good, p. 228
De unga åhörarna fick höra om det extrema landet i norr och hur det kan bli mer likt normala länder i World Values Survey diagram. De ställde kloka frågor om vad detta skulle innebära t ex i välståndsförändringar vilket kan besvaras med att USA, Australien och övriga Skandinavien är minst lika rika el tom rikare men med mer normala värderingar. Här finns min PPT.
Snart kommer den svenska översättningen, prel kallad Bortom Extremsverige. Både den och den engelska upplagan kommer också finnas som eböcker.
I have been delighted the last weeks to hear that my former colleagues in India are doing so well in campaigning for liberal ideas there. Spreading liberal ideology is not easy in a country that still believes in state control and socialism, even if more rhetorical than practical. The liberal think tank Centre for Civil Society (CCS) has been at centre for three people and good friends who now have earned international recognition. Here they are:
1. Parth J. Shah, founder and president of CCS, came second in a video contest arranged by the Milton Friedman Foundation in a well spoken video presentation of his use of Friedman’s ideas of school choice in India. The School Choice Campaign at CCS (where I worked in 2010) is direct result of Shah’s inspiration.
2. Baladevan Ranganjaru, founder and director of the liberal think tank India Institute, and formerly at School Choice Campaign too, received a special mention for Young Institute at Atlas Network for his team who worked in the Indian state of Bihar, finding over 1000 small budget private schools which changed the education planning at regional level.This comprehensive and innovative approach has provided a huge body of easily appreciable evidence that the local government under reports private school contribution to justify its monopoly.
3. Baishali Bomjan, associate director of Asia Centre for Enterprise (ACE) at CCS and Atlas Network, is launching a new initiative to implement liberal ideas into business in India. ACE will encourage students, faculty, and young professionals in journalism and media, economics and humanities, as well as various forms of art to promote liberal initiatives across India and Asia. Those who have already decided to work in the field of social change shall be introduced to liberal approach and get support for their initial projects through seed capital grants, and get help to convert them into viable programs and institutions in their own right.
I am very glad that these great Indian liberals have been honored. Indian liberalism has not always been so well supported and little in known about the liberalism of Mahatma Gandhi, yes even he ! – and C. Rajagopalichari for instance. To keep up with the emerging discussions on liberal politics, economy and ideology, visit the blog Spontaneus Order.
Two writers of Indian descent but brought up in USA has captured my interest, Anand Giridharadas and Sadia Shepard.
Anand was the first IHT correspondent in India in 2004 and wrote his narrative non-fiction India calling2011. There he tells the story of his family leaving India in 1960s due to its poverty but also its traditions, rustic partiarchial life patterns and inability to nurture dreams. Anand did the opposite in re-entering India in 2004 to write about the emerging India for the world´s largest international daily. He gave a talk at Google recently about the background of the writing. The style is close to newpapers columns and very easy to take to, but there is a depth below the surface that gives a much more complicated feeling of what it is to live in India today with your eyes open.
Sadia Shepard has a more complicated family background that gives her reason to settle back in India (Anand is Tamil-Punjabi, stange but still imaginable): American Christan father, Muslim mother with Jewish roots. Sadia wrote in 2009 her book The girl from foreign about her search for the small Jewish congregation of Beth Israel, which are said to have come to India over two thousand years ago. She is a documentary film maker which gives her a reason to find her family roots around Pune and Mumbai, travelling with her brother and other film students. She was brought up in USA not knowing that her grandmother was Jewish until her late teens and the story unfolds into a remarkable identity puzzle. The style is personal but not sentimental, keeping the tearful American kind of huge feelings at bay.
Both books give new personal insights into the Indian identity as it expands into Western culture without losing its Hindustani distinct voice. Another generation of writers of Indian heritage has emerged, totally Westernized yet loyal to the land of their families.
Gurcharan Das is an Indian intellectual and businessman that makes you test your present ethical choices against the Mahbarat tradition of Krishna and the family feud of 2500 years ago. His book The difficulty of being good was an introduction to Hindu ethics for me in 2010 when I worked under his leadership at CCS, a liberal think tank in New Delhi. I was reminded of him last night and listend to an interview with him that is a good introduction. Das was CEO of Procter and Gamble in India but left early to pursue his spiritual and scholarly ambitions. Thank you.
It was good to see friends again and the discussions were familiar matter to me. Sorry to note, the well reknowed educationist Vinod Raina could not attend the discussion. He was instrumental in shaping the RTE Act. I had already interviewed him last year for the Student First Magazine, but alas could not see him this time.
From the minutes taken by the new young SCC team:
”Chaired by Jan Sjunnesson, former Associate Director, School Choice Campaign with Surendra Nath Dubey, President of All India Awardee Teachers Association and Shashank Shukla, Teach for India Fellow, Chairman at Gurukul Education Society and member of the National Advisory Council Working Group as panelists, the discussions explored the means through which the RTE Act addresses the issue of teacher accountability and looked at possible solutions. Jan outlined the major problems in relation with teacher accountability before introducing the panelists. He summarised the principal problems in India such as the absence of teachers and the shortage of educators that the government is facing while trying to implement RTE Act. In addition he mentioned that the RTE Act is vague on the issue of teacher accountability. He commented on the lack of a direct correlation between teacher salaries and student learning outcomes in India.”
Idag gick jag till den stora demonstrationen mot korruption i centrala New Delhi. Aktivisten Anna Hazare har slagits mot regeringen i veckor nu och haktats i omgangar men inte givit upp. Hans lagforslag innebar att alla tjansteman inkl riksdagsman och regeringsledamoter inkl preminarministern ska kunna atalas for korruption, nogot som idag ar svart pga deras immunitetsskydd. Han vill infora Jan Lokpal Bill (Citizens’ ”Ombudsman”, den svenska beteckningen anvands i hela varlden!)
Anna Hazare lag pa en brits i den gula byggnaden ovan medan 1000tals satt runt om och hade trevligt. Folk strommade till och pa eftermiddagen var 100 000tals demonstranter dar.Tal och sang avbrot varann, mat och dryck delades ut gratis och stamningen lag pa topp. Mera folkfest an politik, mera Woodstock an Norra Bantorget. Valorganiserat och trevligt med mojligheter att ordna egna demonstrationer i landet och att donera pengar, som jag.
Kampen med fasta och offentliga massdemonstrationer ska fortsatta till sista augusti 2011. Far inte Anna Hazare igenom sitt forslag kommer han stalla till med ett helvete i hela Indien sager han. En fd chauffor, 70 ar, som jamfors med Gandhi forstas dar han ligger pa en brits och fastar. Sedan 19 aug har han inte atit nagot och har darmed tagit upp samma metod som forebilden Mahatma, den Stora Anden. Skrivet pa min huvudbonad (sk Nehru cap) star det Me Anna hu! Jag ar Anna. Vi ar Anna ! Jai Hind !!
Idag firar Indien sin 65:e sjalvstandighetsdag. Robert Gustafsson skriver pa Voltaire om landets historia, sa las dar om ni vill ha glada tillrop och sluta lasa har. Jag surar.
Visst vill jag gratulera men vill i alla fall beskriva detta min andra hemland som ett land i fritt fall och utan styrsel under NPA II (2008 – 2012 regering). Reformtakten inom ekonomi och politik efter 2004-2008 har kommit av sig. Exempelvis, indiska progressiva valfardsekonomer talar om att mata fattigdom men gor mycket lite for att skapa forutsattningar for tillvaxt. Reformerna i denna andra regeringsperiod har gatt i sta pga band till vanstern, regionala partier och statapparatens ovilja till forandring. Samtidigt vill man bli en supermakt men korruptionen ar ett alltfor stort hinder. Och med korruption i staten, ingen reell marknadsekonomi, ingen tillvaxt, inga pengar.
Kapitalism och liberalism ar alltsa fortfarande skallsord sedan Nehrus sjalvstandighetsforklaring 1947. Indiens Hogsta Domstol skrader inte orden utan skyller problemen med revolutionar terrorism, sk naxalism, pa ”neoliberalismen”. Landets hogsta juridiska instans ar politisk till sin natur och foretrader socialism som finns inskriven i konstitutionen. Landet har en slags marknadsekonomi men ocksa 5 arsplaner och starka regleringar som hindrar utveckling. Landet ligger pa 124:e plats i ekonomisk frihet.
Var ”egen Indienexpert” Jan Myrdal ar inte till nytta for att utveckla ekonomin som vi vet, utan ar ogenomtankt och revolutionsromantisk i sin analys av vansterterrorismen i sin senaste bok. Patrick Frenchs nya bok India – A portait verkar dock ge mer realism ang upproren, an Myrdal.
Ska man forsta de senaste decenniernas otroliga utveckling av tillvaxtfaktorer i de fattigare landerna kan man istallet ta del av Johan Norbergs utmarkta rapport till regeringens Globaliseringsrad (2007). De 100-tals miljoner som lyfts ut fattigdom sedan 1990-talets liberaliseringar i Indien och annorstades har marknadsekonomi att tacka, inte socialism visar Norberg. Avregleringar skapar valstand och tillvaxt sa det blir mer att fordela till de fattigare. Indiska politiker har inte orkat ta detta till sig utan tvekar. Under tiden springer Kina, Brasilien, Turkiet, Sydafrika m fl forbi. Sura gratulationer.
Scandinavia and India are usually very far from one another in culture, values and life styles. Looking at the World Values Survey map we see Sweden at the extreme end (how many Swedes know that?), Norway slightly less secular and individualistic – and then India quite far down in traditional, survival values with little self –expression.
Still in the last weeks with Norway’s terror massacre in July 2011, our regions are afflicted by same cold terrorism. In Sweden during Christmas 2010, an attack was averted in central Stockholm, but the same logical and violent behaviour was present; calculating for years, buying tools, posting on Internet just before etc.
In India terrorism seems less rational, as when three bombs exploded this summer 2011 and no one claimed responsibility. BBC, Wall Street Journal’ India blog and our Per Andersson commented.The attacks were on the open multiculturalism of Mumbai/Bombay they claimed. Indian Muslims were being persecuted before and now they retaliated. I am not so sure about that. There is little evidence of poverty being the cause of terrorism, as Foregin Affairs claims.
The causes behind these attacks are of course very hard to disentangle, but two stand out for me; the ideology and the individual. Not material wealth or social structures.
Firstly: In Norway, the madman tried to link his terrorist outlook to Indian nationalism, which have been involved in their own attacks on Muslims and, most likely, in attacks that they want to pin on Muslims. The Hindu nationalist party BJP does not want further investigations in these links.
If ideology can be a cause of terrorism, and we all know that, what can be done? The ideological scenes where such views are visible must be confronted openly and fought down with arguments and actions. No dismissal anymore as almost all Swedish ddebaters want to do now after Norway’s sad event. Time to talk with the not so politically correct.
Secondly, the individuals that hold these terrorist leaning views must be surveyed and monitored. Nothing illiberal about that. All societies must defend themselves and here the last years’ heated discussions about screening the telecommunications and internet (FRA-lagen) in Sweden will have to take a second thought.
Going back to the map of values. Neither traditional nor modern societies can be safe for madcaps and their violent ideologies. Globalization makes all fluid, flat, interdependent – including negative actions. Modern day jihadists and anti-jihadists are in a sense more open and reachable today with our networks. We must talk, convince and confront them. Even kill them yes as OBL was.
I go out in the mad Indian traffic in South Delhi. Terrorism seems far away but the police fences by the road reminds me as I chew my breakfast of poris and tea. As in Sweden, these roadblocks are mostly useless and should be replaced by net savvy intelligence officers, an enlightened public and good psychatric outdoor facilities.